Časopis pro reflexi křesťanských souvislostí v sociálních a humanitních oborech

Caritas et veritas 2018, 8(2):129-136 | DOI: 10.32725/cetv.2018.041

Theologians at the Bedside: On the Role of Theology in Contemporary Bioethical Discourse

Gusztáv Kovács
Theological College of Pécs, Department of Human Dignity and Social Justice, 7625 Pécs, Hunyadi János u.11.

The article discusses the role and mission of theologians in contemporary bioethical discourse. Christian bioethicists turn out to be the odd ones out in any academic discourse from a methodological perspective, however, this peripheral position can also be viewed as a privileged situation. They can act with exceptional freedom in domains which require cooperation between different disciplines, such as bioethics. Moral theologians can contribute most if they make use of this role of being the odd-one-out, with the attitude of having nothing to lose, and by placing relationships, the vulnerable, faith, everyday life experience, and the uncommon at the centre of the discourse. They can go beyond the limits of bioethical conversations centred on legal and medical questions bringing in viewpoints inspired by the long tradition of the praxis of the Church.

Klíčová slova: Christianity, bioethics, moral theology, moral epistemology, post-secular society

Zveřejněno: 30. září 2018  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kovács, G. (2018). Theologians at the Bedside: On the Role of Theology in Contemporary Bioethical Discourse. Caritas et veritas8(2), 129-136. doi: 10.32725/cetv.2018.041
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. © Stanley HAUERWAS, How to write a theological sentence, available from: http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2013/09/26/3856546.htm, cited 20th December 2017.
  2. David J. ROTHMAN, Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 2003.
  3. Gyula GAIZLER and Kálmán NYÉKI, Bioetika, Budapest: Gondolat, 2003.
  4. Martin BUBER, Ich und Du, Heidelberg: Schneider, 1958.
  5. Claudia WIESEMANN, Von der Verantwortung, ein Kind zu bekommen. Eine Ethik der Elternschaft, München: Beck, 2006.
  6. Hans JONAS, The Imperative of Responsibility, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
  7. Onora O'NEILL, Children's Rights and Children's Lives, Ethics 3/1988, pp. 445-463. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  8. Jürgen HABERMAS, Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik?, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2005.
  9. Giovanni MAIO, Wenn die Technik die Vorstellung bestellbarer Kinder weckt, in: Kinderwunsch und Reproduktionmedizin. Ethische Herausforderungen der technisierten Fortpflanzung, eds. Giovanni MAIO, Tobias EICHINGER and Claudia BOZZARO, Freiburg: Alber, 2013.
  10. © Jürgen HABERMAS, Notes on Post-Secular Society, New Perspectives Quarterly 4/2008, pp. 17-29. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  11. © Amy FRYKHOLM, Can doctors help us die well?, available from: https://www.christiancentury.org/article/2014-10/can-doctors-help-us-die-well, cited 20th December 2017.
  12. Gerhard MARSCHÜTZ, theologisch ethisch nachdenken. Band 1: Grundlagen, Würzburg: Echter Verlag, 2009.
  13. © Paul M. ZULEHNER, Pastoraltheologie Bd.1. Fundamentalpastoral, Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1989.

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), která umožňuje distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.