Journal for Christian reflections in the context of social sciences and humanities

Caritas et veritas 2015, 5(2):102-111 | DOI: 10.32725/cetv.2015.036

Human Dignity as the Foundation of the Patient-Physician Relationship

Martina Pavelková
Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Teologická fakulta, Katedra etiky, psychologie a charitativní práce, Kněžská 8, 370 01 České Budějovice

This article reflects the relationship between patient and physician, mainly with regard to the Czech law. The concept of health and disease in each historical period also influenced the patient-physician relationship. Different kinds of this relationship are demonstrated on four models. When we reflect the relationship between physician and patient, with all its difficulties and possibilities, we recognize human dignity as the basis of this relationship.

Keywords: physician, patient, relationship, human dignity, autonomy, informed consent

Published: September 30, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pavelková, M. (2015). Human Dignity as the Foundation of the Patient-Physician Relationship. Caritas et veritas5(2), 102-111. doi: 10.32725/cetv.2015.036
Download citation

References

  1. Gerhard KÖBLER, Vom Arzt im Recht zum Arztrecht, in: Humaniora: Medizin - Recht - Geschichte, Bern-Rüdiger KERN a kol., Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006, s. 157-172. Go to original source...
  2. Tomáš DOLEŽAL, Vztah lékaře a pacienta z pohledu soukromého práva, Příbram: Leges, 2012.
  3. Dietrich von ENGELHARDT, Die Arzt-Patient-Beziehung - gestern, heute, morgen, in: Die Arzt-Patient-Beziehung im Wandel, ed. Klaus ARNOLD, Stuttgart: Thieme, 1996, s. 19-47.
  4. Dietrich von ENGELHARDT, Das Bild des Arztes in medizinhistorischer Sicht, in: Arzt - Patient. Zur Geschichte und Bedeutung einer Beziehung, Tübingen: Attempto, 2001, s. 31-42.
  5. Claus BUDDEBERG (ed.), Psychosoziale Medizin, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2004. Go to original source...
  6. Karl JASPERS, Ein Beispiel: ärztliche Therapie, in: Philosophie, sv. 1, Berlin, 1932, s. 121-129.
  7. Ezekiel J. EMANUEL - Linda L. EMANUEL, Four models of the physician-patient relationship, The Journal of the American Medical Association 16/1992, s. 2221-2226. Go to original source...
  8. Gilman BURKE, Ethic and medical decision-making, Primary Care 7/1980, s. 615-624. Go to original source...
  9. Robert M. VEATCH, Models for ethical medicine in a revolutionary age, Hastings Cent Report 2/1972, s. 3-5. Go to original source...
  10. Tom L. Beauchamp, James F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  11. Monika BOBBERT - Micha H. WERNER, Autonomie/Selbstbestimmung, in: Handbuch Ethik und Recht der Forschung am Menschen, C. Lenk a kol., Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2014, s. 105-114. Go to original source...
  12. Amy L. McGUIRE - Laurence B. McCULLOUGH - Susan C. WELLER - Simon N. WHITNEY, Missed Expectations? Physicians' Views of Patients' Participation in Medical Decision-Making, Medical Care 5/2005, s. 466-470. Go to original source...
  13. Tomáš DOLEŽAL, Problematické aspekty vztahu lékaře a pacienta zejména s ohledem na institut tzv. informovaného souhlasu, Časopis zdravotnického práva a bioetiky 1/2011, s. 25-35.
  14. Tom L. BEAUCHAMP - Ruth R. FADEN, A History and Theory of Informed Consent, Oxford - New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
  15. Jaime S. KING - Benjamin MOULTON, Rethinking Informed Consent: The Case for Shared Medical Decision-Making, American Journal of Law & Medicine 32/2006, s. 429-501. Go to original source...
  16. Martin Hans SASS, Advance Directives for Psychiatric Patients? Balancing Paternalism and Autonomy, Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 17-18/2003, s. 380-384. Go to original source...
  17. Adam DOLEŽAL, Informovaný souhlas jako vyjádření autonomie vůle nebo reflexe paternalistického vztahu?, Časopis zdravotnického práva a bioetiky 1/2011.
  18. Immanuel KANT, Náboženství v hranicích pouhého rozumu, Praha: Vyšehrad, 2013.
  19. Knut BERNER, Der Hass auf die Wohltäter. Anthropologische und ethische Überlegungen zur Arzt-Patienten-Beziehung, Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik 4/2012, s. 327-339.
  20. Wendy A. ROGERS, Is There a Moral Duty for Doctors to Trust Patients?, Journal of Medical Ethics 2/2002, s. 77-80. Go to original source...
  21. Howard M. SPIRO, What is Empathy and Can It Be Taught?, in: Empathy and the Practice of Medicine: Beyond Pills and the Scalpel, Howard M. SPIRO - Deborah St. JAMES, Yale University Press, 1996, s. 7-14.
  22. Rebecca GARDEN, The Problem of Empathy: Medicine and the Humanities, New Literary History 3/2007, s. 551-567. Go to original source...
  23. Jaromír MATĚJEK, Co je nemoc a proc si pacienti na nás porád stěžují, Pediatrie pro praxi 1/2011, s. 51-52.
  24. © Miles R. BORE, Dignity: Not Useless, Just a Concept in Need of Greater Understanding, BMJ Rapid Responses, February 17, 2004 (on-line), dostupné na: http://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/10/30/dignity-not-useless-just-concept-need-greater-understanding, citováno dne 28. 11. 2015.
  25. Roberto Andorno - Marcus Düwell, Der Menschenwürdebegriff in der Bioethik, in: Menschenwürde und Medizin: ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch, ed. Jan C. JOERDEN, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2013, s. 465-481.
  26. Ruth MACKLIN, Dignity is a useless concept. It means no more than respect for persons or their autonomy, BMJ 327/2003, s. 1419-1420. Go to original source...
  27. Ottfried HÖFFE, Medizin ohne Ethik?, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2002.
  28. Marta MUNZAROVá, Důstojnost člověka a lékařská etika, Časopis lékařů českých 9/2011, s. 499-501.
  29. Marta MUNZAROVÁ, Důstojnost člověka v kontextu lékařství, in: Etika a komunikace v medicíně, Praha: Grada Publishing, 2011, s. 51-58.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.