Journal for Christian reflections in the context of social sciences and humanities

Caritas et veritas 2018, 8(2):210-224 | DOI: 10.32725/cetv.2018.047

The Concept of Control in Selected Codes of Ethics in Social Work

Radka Janebová, Zuzana Truhlářová
Univerzita Hradec Králové, Filozofická fakulta, Ústav sociální práce, Víta Nejedlého 573, 500 00 Hradec Králové

Social work is referred to as an ambivalent profession which includes both assistance and control. This leads to a number of dilemmas. As support when seeking for the solution to those dilemmas one could use the Code of Ethics for social workers of the Czech Republic. Due to the fact that its current form does not focus on the topic of control and that there are not many guides in the Czech language for its processing, the aim of this text is to find out how control work with clients is processed by selected codes of ethics. In order to achieve the goal, we chose a qualitative analysis of eight selected codes of ethics. We have found that the codes examined can be distinguished according to logic - explicit use of the term control, legitimate/illegitimate control, contraindication of control, the situation of legitimate control, the form of control, and ethics of control work. This text is devoted to the first four categories. It is this scope that could be used in the eventual consensus of experts about the new necessity to incorporate parts dealing with control into the Czech Code.

Keywords: social work, control, legitimacy, code of ethics, neoliberalism

Published: September 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Janebová, R., & Truhlářová, Z. (2018). The Concept of Control in Selected Codes of Ethics in Social Work. Caritas et veritas, 8(2), 210-224. doi: 10.32725/cetv.2018.047
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article
    Czech version

    References

    1. © English Oxford Living Dictionaries, Control (on-line), dostupné na: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/control, citováno dne 3. 4. 2018.
    2. © Cambridge Dictionary, Control (on-line), dostupné na: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/control, citováno dne 3. 4. 2018.
    3. Kolektiv autorů, Ilustrovaný encyklopedický slovník, Praha: Academia, 1981.
    4. Ivan ÚLEHLA, Umění pomáhat, Praha: SLON, 1999.
    5. Radka JANEBOVÁ - Zuzana TRUHLÁŘOVÁ, Pojetí kontroly z perspektivy klienta sociální práce, Kontakt 1/2018, s. 65-73.
    6. Cyrus S. BEHROOZI, A Model for Social Work with Involuntary Applicants in Groups, Social Work with Groups 2-3/1993, s. 223-238. Go to original source...
    7. Sondra BURMAN, Revisiting the Agent of Social Control Role: Implications for Substance Abuse Treatment, Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community 2/2004, s. 197-209. Go to original source...
    8. © AKADEMIKERFÖRBUNDET SSR, Ethics in Social Work - A Code of Conduct and Ethical Behaviour for Social Workers (online), dostupné na: https://akademssr.se/sites/default/files/files/ethics_in_social_work_0.pdf,aktualizace 2015, citováno dne 8. 12. 2016.
    9. David WIILLSHIRE - Stanley L. BRODSKY, Toward a Taxonomy of Unwillingness: Initial Steps in Engaging the Unwilling Client, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 8/2001, s. 154-160. Go to original source...
    10. Chris TROTTER, Working with Involuntary Clients. A Guide to Practice, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE, 2006.
    11. © AASW, Code of Ethics (online), dostupné na: https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/1201,aktualizace 2010, citováno dne 8. 12. 2016.
    12. Chris TROTTER - Tony WARD, Involuntary Clients, Pro-social Modelling and Ethics, Ethics and Social Welfare 1/2012, s. 74-90. Go to original source...
    13. Sarah BANKS, Ethics and Values in Social Work, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.
    14. Chris CLARK, Social Work Ethics. Politics, Prinicples and Practice, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.
    15. Paul SENIOR, The Probation Order: Vehicle of Social Work or Social Control?, Probation Journal 2/1984, s. 64-70. Go to original source...
    16. Geert van der LAAN, Otázky legitimace sociální práce, Boskovice: Albert, Ostrava: Zdravotně sociální fakulta Ostravské univerzity, 1998.
    17. Carolyn NOBLE, Postmodern Thinking Where is it Taking Social Work?, Journal of Social Work 3/2004, s. 289-304. Go to original source...
    18. Roger SMITH, Social Work and Power, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2008.
    19. Phyllis J. DAY, Social Welfare: Context for Social Control, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 1/1981, s. 29-44.
    20. Ian HYSLOP, Social Work as a Practice of Freedom, Journal of Social Work 4/2011, s. 404-422. Go to original source...
    21. Radka JANEBOVÁ - Zuzana TRUHLÁŘOVÁ, Janusova tvář sociální práce: Tři pohledy na pojetí kontroly v sociální práci, Sociální práce / Sociálna práca 6/2017, s. 116-130.
    22. Ernst SALAMON, Kdo je zákazníkem sociálních služeb?, Sociální politika 2/2001, s. 6-9.
    23. Peter LEONARD, The Function of Social Work in Society, in: Talking about Welfare: Readings in Philosophy and Social Policy, ed. Noel W. TIMMS - David WATSON, Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976, s. 252-266. Go to original source...
    24. Radka JANEBOVÁ, Vybrané principy kritické sociální práce v kontextu kontroly nedobrovolných klientů, Sociální práce / Sociálna práca 3/2018, s. 5-21.
    25. Michel FOUCAULT, Security, Territory, Population, New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007.
    26. Radka JANEBOVÁ, Kdy je legitimní vykonávat v sociální práci kontrolu, Fórum sociální práce 2/2017, s. 24-38.
    27. Loïc WACQUANT, Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually Existing Neoliberalism, Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 1/2012, s. 66-79. Go to original source...
    28. Jiří MERTL, Přerozdělování welfare. Nátroj pomoci, nebo kontroly?, Brno: Doplněk, 2017.
    29. John J. RODGER, Social Work as Social Control Re-examined Beyond the Dispersal of Discipline Thesis, Sociology 4/1988, s. 563-581. Go to original source...
    30. Ping Kwong KAM, Back to the 'Social' of Social Work: Reviving the Social Work Profession's Contribution to the Promotion of Social Justice, International Social Work 6/2012, s. 723-740. Go to original source...
    31. Steve ROGOWSKI, Radical/Critical Social Work with Young Offenders: Challenges and Possibilities, Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health Welfare and the Community 1/2014, s. 7-21. Go to original source...
    32. Jacques DONZELOT, The Policing of Families: Welafare Versus the State, London: Hutchinson University Library, 1979.
    33. Jane DONAGHUE, Antisocial Behaviour Orders (ASBOs) in Britain Contextualizing Risk and Reflexive Modernization, Sociology 2/2008, s. 337-355. Go to original source...
    34. Amanda M. GENGLER, Mothering under the Gaze: Policing Motherhood in a Battered Women's Shelter, International Journal of Sociology of the Family 1/2011, s. 131-152.
    35. Andrea SMITH, Not-seeing: State Surveillance, Settler Colonialism, and Gender Violence. in: Feminist Surveillance Studies, ed. Rachel DUBROFSKY - Shosahana A. MAGNET, Durham: Duke University Press, 2015, s. 21-38. Go to original source...
    36. Torin MONAHAN, Regulating Belonging: Surveillance, Inequality, and the Cultural Production of Abjection, Journal of Cultural Economy 2/2017, s. 191-206. Go to original source...
    37. © Radka JANEBOVÁ, Sociální pracovníci: Obecní uklízeči lidského odpadu? (online), dostupné na: https://blisty.cz/art/75198-socialni-pracovnici-obecni-uklizeci-lidskeho-odpadu.html,aktualizace 2014, citováno dne 26. 3. 2018.
    38. Jan KELLER, Tři sociální světy. Sociální struktura postindustriální společnosti, Praha: SLON, 2010.
    39. Mike DEE, Welfare Surveillance, Income Management and New Paternalism in Australia, Surveillance & Society 3/2013, s. 272-286. Go to original source...
    40. Mirka NEČASOVÁ, Profesní etika, in: Metody a řízení sociální práce, ed. Oldřich MATOUŠEK a kol., Praha: Portál, 2003.
    41. Catherine MCDONALD, Challenging Social Work. The Institutional Context of Practice, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
    42. © Andrew OLSON, Authoring a Code of Ethics: Observations on Process and Organization (online), dostupné na: http://ethics.iit.edu/ecodes/authoring-code,aktualizace 1998, citováno dne 6. 4. 2018.
    43. Paul WILDING, Professional Power and Social Welfare, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982.
    44. Merrylyn ASQUITH, Ideals, Myths and Realities… A Postmodern Analysis of Moral-ethical Decision-making and Professional Ethics in Social Work Practice, University of South Australia, 2002.
    45. Sandra W. FELKENES, The Social Work Professional and his Ethics: A Philosophical Analysis, PhD Thesis, University of Alabama, 1980.
    46. Ralph DOLGOFF - Louise R. SKOLNIK, Ethical Decision-making in Social Work with Groups: An Empirical Study, Social Work with Groups 2/1996, s. 49-64. Go to original source...
    47. Ruth LANDAU, Professional Socialization, Ethical Judgement and Decision Making Orientation in Social Work, Journal of Social Service Research 4/1999, s. 57-75. Go to original source...
    48. Clifford G. CHRISTIANS, Ethics and politics in qualitative research', in Handbook of Qualitative Research, eds. Norman DENZIN - Yvonna S. LINCOLN, Thousand Oaks: Sage, s. 133-155.
    49. © ČESKÝ STATISTICKÝ ÚŘAD, Vybrané údaje o sociálním zabezpečení za rok 2016 (online), dostupné na: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/46002380/19002917.pdf/30a86875-3361-44c4-ae3c-d3ad502f68fa?version=1.0,aktualizace 2017, citováno dne 22. 2. 2018.
    50. Gøsta ESPING-ANDERSEN, After the Golden Age? Welfare State Dilemmas in a Global Economy, in: Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies, ed. Gøsta ESPING-ANDERSEN, London: SAGE Publications, 1996, s. 1-31. Go to original source...
    51. © SPOLEČNOST SOCIÁLNÍCH PRACOVNÍKŮ, Etický kodex sociálních pracovníků České republiky (online), dostupný na: http://socialnipracovnici.cz/public/upload/image/eticky_kodex_sspcr.pdf,aktualizace 2006, citováno dne 14. 6. 2017.
    52. © SLOVENSKÁ KOMORA SOCIÁLNÍCH PRACOVNÍKŮ, Etický kódex sociálneho pracovníka a asistenta sociálnej práce Slovenskej republiky (online), dostupné na: https://www.employment.gov.sk/files/slovensky/rodina-socialna-pomoc/socialna-praca/eticky-kodex_final-3.pdf,aktualizace 2015, citováno dne 14. 6. 2017.
    53. © IFSWa, Statement of Ethical Principles (online), dostupné na: http://ifsw.org/policies/statement-of-ethical-principles/,aktualizace 2012, citováno dne 6. 12. 2016.
    54. © CASW, Guidelines for Ethical Practice (online), dostupné na: http://www.casw-acts.ca/sites/default/files/attachements/CASW_Guidelines%20for%20Ethical%20Practice.pdf,aktualizace 2005, citováno dne 8. 12. 2016.
    55. © CASW, Code of Ethics (online), dostupné na: https://casw-acts.ca/sites/casw-acts.ca/files/attachements/casw_code_of_ethics.pdf,aktualizace 2005, citováno dne 8. 12. 2016.
    56. © IFSWb, Global Social Work Statement of Ethical Principles (online), dostupné na: https://www.ifsw.org/statement-of-ethical-principles/,aktualizace 2. července 2018, citováno dne 30. 8. 2018.
    57. © BASW, The Code of Ethics for Social Work Statement of Principles (online), dostupné na: http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_112315-7.pdf,aktualizace 2012, citováno dne 8. 12. 2016.
    58. Standardy kvality sociálních služeb. Výkladový sborník pro poskytovatele, Praha: MPSV, 2008.
    59. Karla Krogsrud MILEY - Michael O'MELIA - Brenda DUBOIS, Generalist Social Work Practice: An Empowering Approach. Boston: Pearson, 2011.
    60. © INCOME MANAGEMENT, Income management - Overview (online), dostupné na: https://www.dss.gov.au/node/33895,aktualizace 2016, citováno dne 23. 3. 2018.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content